The Repugnant Of South Africa
Finding cheer in the grotesque hypocrisy of the rainbow nations Freak show
The #CCMA has become the latest in this political right freakshow, which is all about “your health”. The “Philanthropricks” didn’t factor South Africa’s Jesters into their plans. The degeneration and absurdity of the (honk honk ) CCMA, is simply a high-note in what is yet another laughable, complicit and unlawful state-run institution. The willing fools are at least delivering on humour while attempting to destroy our national sovereignty.
The Western Cape Government and all the Cape channels were clearly delighted by this ruling. The Democratic Alliance clearly has an alliance. Actually, it’s called funding. Check their Facebook wall for their total outrage at this derogation of our Bill of rights, and you’ll find … Crickets!
Even the once “human rights, freedom-loving” activist and journalist (now clearly a Politician) Helen Zille’s lack of journalistic skill on safety and efficacy tells you all you need to know. You were sold down the river if you voted for them or Action SA. Their silence is all you need to know regarding their stance on whether this is about your health, and if we should “follow the science”. Seems they agree with Dr Fauci when he says “ I am science”. If so, then they also agree with the fact that he has been accused.
Facing The Possibility Of Firing?
For those facing possible firing from their positions based on their unwillingness to have their bodily autonomy abused by the state, it's come to light that the CCMA failed to consider the implications of their ruling in the recent case of Theresa Mulderij v. The Goldrush Group.
“In fact, they've caused a particularly difficult position for corporates based on this precedent. Whilst trying to dodge the absolute law in South Africa, they didn't consider the Unemployment implications. Stupidly so. When first we try to deceive comes to mind.....
The Commissioner found that the employee in this matter was permanently incapacitated and therefore fairly dismissed by the employer. The Commissioner did not indicate which form of incapacity was applicable in this instance, and no medical document of incapacity was therefore given. UIF guys were not impressed, as they are going to have to cough up for this ridiculous ruling and the THOUSANDS that come flooding in as the (kick-back offered) corporates thought they could get away with not having to retrench their staff and more than likely have some incentive on the go outside of that.
Let’s take a moment to see who gets fired these days for doing their job.
Ruling Held No Bearing
Irrespective of which type the Commissioner deemed to be applicable, all of them require that some sort of inability to perform, on the part of the employee, is present. It is common cause that the particular employee had no impediment which prevented her from performing her duties. The impediment was created by the vaccination rule implemented by the employer and had no bearing on the capacity of the employee.
Therefore, the dismissal could never have been one based on incapacity and the true nature of the dispute was misconstrued by the Commissioner.
Further to this, the Commissioner seemingly conflated incapacity dismissals with misconduct dismissals. Incapacity dismissals are no-fault dismissals, which means that no fault is attributed to the employee for dismissal. It is clear that the Commissioner assigned fault to the employee for “refusing to participate in the creation of a safe working environment”. The fault is an element of misconduct and not incapacity.
Section 36
Furthermore, apart from ignoring important evidence, the Commissioner did not consider section 36 of the Constitution, dealing with the limitation of rights, completely ignored the anti-discriminatory provisions of the Employment Equity Act (EEA), failed to take notice of the provisions of the Code of Good Practice: People with Disabilities, as directed by Annexure C of the “Consolidated Direction on Occupational Health and Safety Measures in Certain Workplaces” and was convinced of the fairness of the dismissal by an internal memo from a judge to his colleagues, which is not binding or, possibly, even permissible.
Source - Jaco Swart - National Manager at the National Employers' Association of South Africa (NEASA). For more information: NEASA Media Department
DickTraitorShip
We are being dictated to by the same people who have crippled the country. Not that smart right?
All of this, as well as several other issues, render this award reviewable. The current situation is therefore as follows:
The CCMA award is seemingly incorrect in both laws and in the conclusion that the Commissioner reached and will not survive a review by the Labour Court.
It is not binding on any other Commissioner or any court and, therefore, does not have to be followed by any other presiding officer.
Schalk van der Merwe goes into more detail on his Facebook post
South Africa’s Vey Own Nostradamus
When the fifth Covid-19 wave is expected to hit South Africa: “expert”
“It will be driven by a new variant and it is unlikely that Omicron will be coming back again. The issue is that nobody can predict what the new variant will look like.”
Karim said that if South Africa had a higher level of vaccination – around 70% – it could further relax restrictions as there would be less of a risk of overwhelming hospitals. However, he noted that the country is only at a 30% (full) vaccination rate, and while past infections do confer some protection, it is not at the same level as being vaccinated.
If the country was highly vaccinated, the government could quite readily lift most remaining restrictions – with the exception of one or two restrictions such as mass indoor gatherings as well as indoor mask mandates, he said.
When the fifth Covid-19 wave is expected to hit South Africa: “expert”. Nothing to see here though. You may lose your job if you investigate it. The majority of people surely can’t be this ignorant? If they are, this may well have been Mr Globals reaonsing to look for a way to “balance” the playing field.
Nothing to see here though. You may lose your job if you investigate it. The majority of people surely can’t be this ignorant? If they are, this may well have been Mr Globals reaonsing to look for a way to “balance” the playing field.
Question It, Or Face The Consequence Of Natural Selection
If you really want to understand the “Why?” of behaviour, then you need to get familiar with people’s motivation.
It can be mechanistic like the innate genetic dispositions of a reflex. Appetitive, which operates in expedient rewards and pleasures such as food. Or, rational conscious thought, which requires intellect and knowledge of right and wrong.
Generally, motivation is mostly about our own goals. So, if you want to understand others, first understand yourself. Knowing the “Why?” will help you stay away from those like the Walrus, and excuse you from enticing betrayals.
This is a story about manipulation using peripheral routes of persuasion. Killers come with smiles and you might be smiling hand in hand with malice. Pay attention, don't aimlessly march to your demise.