South African Government & CCMA Guilty of violating International Law. Remember the Maputo Protocol?
The Historical and Irresistible urge of "African leaders" to collude with Big Pharma cash. Now we have to contend with the African CDC!
Anit vaxxer this. Vaccine hesitancy that. If only the “Great Western World” and the elite South Africans could sit down for a moment and understand the History of abuses this continent has endured.
Many on the back of Pharmaceutical companies. it is important to remember that in some countries distrust stems not only from ignorance but also from lived experience.
Dr Samaila Suleiman, a lecturer of History at the Bayero University Kano, argues that scepticism over the COVID-19 vaccine can be traced to historical cynicism against the motives of Western powers in Africa.
“It is important to also note that the COVID-19 vaccine scepticism is not peculiar to the uninformed members of the community. There are highly placed members of the elite and political class who have refused the COVID-19 vaccine, citing a Western conspiracy to decimate the African population,”
In a study entitled “Ethics of Clinical Trials in Nigeria,” Dr. Patrick I. Okonta of Delta State University, Abraka, Delta, Nigeria, found that developing countries offer considerably attractive conditions for companies hoping to minimize the price of pharmaceutical trials.
“Pharmaceutical companies are business companies and like all business companies, their main objective is to maximise profit while reducing cost of production. ...Developing countries hold a large reservoir of diseases and the required number of patients can be recruited within a short duration. Also, compensation for lost time and wages paid to research participants in developing countries is small compared to what is payable to research participants in developed countries.”
Vaccine distrust is one legacy of unethical Big Pharma and now, Philanthropical (Bill Gates and his Wife) practices.
And Here We Are … Again?
"That’s right, despite a clear downward trend in mostly-mild #Omicron cases, “health experts” want shots imposed indiscriminately throughout the whole population. And adding even more to the cognitive dissonance here are the reasons they cite for the decrease:
If you are going to #FollowScience, then please can we continue to do so by following the Data? You obviously understand now why Africans in general started this journey with no trust?
“The Covid Narrative Falls Apart in South Africa”
Last week, China Daily published an article that perfectly encapsulates the magical thinking taking place worldwide around Covid-19. Titled “Plea for jabs even as Africa infections trend lower,” the piece described how African “health experts” are “stepping up calls for more people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in a bid to ward off future outbreaks even as trends point to a decline in the growth rate for new infections.”
That’s right, despite a clear downward trend in mostly-mild Omicron cases, “health experts” want shots imposed indiscriminately throughout the whole population. And adding even more to the cognitive dissonance here are the reasons they cite for the decrease:
“John Nkengasong, director of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), attributed South Africa’s decrease in new infection cases to increased population levels of antibodies, meaning that many people have been infected so hence developed antibodies #naturalimmunity combined with the "high vaccination rate" in the country.” wrote Edith Mutethya before adding the kicker: “To date, #SouthAfrica has fully vaccinated 27.3 per cent of its population.”
This is, of course, a perfect example of how ‘health officials’ massage and manipulate the facts to suit their narrative. In this case, in his drive to get more “jabs,” John Nkengasong laughably tells us the country’s “high vaccination rate” is partially responsible for the decline in Omicron cases. A “high vaccination rate,” in this case, of … wait for it … 27.3 per cent." Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) It really doesn't do you or your Director justice.”
Why is the virus raging again in Israel, the most vaccinated and boosted country on the planet? Why is there no statistical difference between virus infection rates in highly vaccinated versus lower uptake areas in the U.S.? Why do the unvaccinated have the lowest infection rate according to disturbing newly revealed data from Scotland? I could go on and on. (And yes, we have asked the same questions about mask use.)
Omicron waves in Israel and South Africa, per capita. Israel has given 4x more vaccine shots to its population than South Africa. Yesterday, Israel was exhibiting the higher incidence per capita in the world among large countries.Relative testing? Yes, that question has been asked and here is the answer:
A Long History Of Abuse
Let's not forget 1 April 2020, when Dr Jean-Paul Mira and Camille Locht, suggested on a live television broadcast that trials of a potential vaccine should first take place in Africa. Africans know their History as they have been exploited for decades, by their African leaders who have colluded with pharmaceutical companies. Nothing new here.
These so-called “Leaders”. We see you. Medical experimentation is not only entrenched in the history of racism and colonialism — but it also sets a dangerous precedent by eroding the critical trust between citizens and health authorities. You have yourself to thank.
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
The United Nations and their Human Rights Commission have completely disappeared off the face of the planet. Where are they? What agenda are they too distracted with to notice the horrific violations around the globe. Or is it an inconvenient or costly conflict to acknowledge? Well, South Africa and Africans must turn toward our Continent and be done with these Europeans and pathological abusers for good. They will never change. We cannot ever trust them. again.
Sure as hell hasn’t done a thing for those in Austria, Spain, Italy, Greece, The Netherlands…… Germany…. How that is going? The European Union is probably one of the most corrupt organs on planet earth after the Vatican it seems.
“No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” - Article 7 of ICCPR
The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (also known as the Banjul Charter) is an international human rights instrument that is intended to promote and protect human rights and basic freedoms in the African continent.
It emerged under the aegis of the Organisation of African Unity (since replaced by the African Union) which, at its 1979 Assembly of Heads of State and Government, adopted a resolution calling for the creation of a committee of experts to draft a continent-wide human rights instrument, similar to those that already existed in Europe. African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights was adopted in 1981, and enacted in 1986.
Clinical Research In Africa
The African Charter recognises a number of rights that are relevant in the context of responding to the needs of participants in clinical research in Africa. For example, the African Charter recognises the right to respect for life and integrity of the person and the right to human dignity.
Research that harms the person or which is exploitative can also be regarded as violating the integrity and security of the person. It is submitted that research, such as where Pfizer treated children for spinal meningitis in Kano, Nigeria, with the experimental drug Trovan, violates article 5 of the African Charter.
At the time the drug was being tested in Nigeria, Trovan had never been tested on children, and earlier that year it had been withdrawn from US markets due to its serious side effects.
The Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa
Following on from recognition that women's rights were often marginalised in the context of human rights, a meeting organised by Women in Law and Development in Africa (WiLDAF) in March 1995, in Lomé, Togo, called for the development of a specific protocol to the African Charter on Human and People's Rights to address the rights of women.
In early 2003, Equality Now hosted a conference of women's groups, to organise a campaign to lobby the African Union to adopt the protocol, and the protocol's text was brought up to international standards. The lobbying was successful, the African Union resumed the process and the finished document was officially adopted by the section summit of the African Union, on 11 July 2003.
The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, better known as the Maputo Protocol, is an international human rights instrument established by the African Union that went into effect in 2005.
“To ensure that the rights of women are promoted, realised and protected in order to enable them to enjoy fully all their human rights.”
It guarantees comprehensive rights to women including the right to take part in the political process, social and political equality with men, improved autonomy in their reproductive health decisions, and an end to female genital mutilation. It was adopted by the African Union in Maputo, Mozambique, in 2003 in the form of a protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (adopted in 1981, enacted in 1986).
The African Charter & The Women’s Rights Protocol in the context of the COVID19 Pandemic
A LEGALLY binding multilateral supplement to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (African Charter), adopted in July 2003 by the African Union Assembly of Heads of State and Government. Also referred to as the "Maputo Protocol,".
On November 25, 2005, the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa entered into force. The protocol significantly advances women’s rights by relocating everyday abuses in the private sphere of the home to the PUBLIC realm of rights violations (businesses) for which STATE (The South African Government) MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!
In addition, the protocol is unique in its express guarantee of women’s right to be protected. The significance and potential of the protocol go well beyond Africa. The treaty affirms reproductive choice and autonomy as a key human right and contains a number of global firsts.
In addition, the protocol is unique in its express guarantee of women’s right to be protected
Once a state has ratified the protocol , the state is bound under INTERNATIONAL LAW to REFRAIN from any acts that would DEFY the object or purpose of the protocol
The principles enshrined in the Women’s Rights Protocol are in some instances based on existing international human rights standards, but in many others significantly advance International Human Rights Standards (Fortunately) and specifically enhance the protection and promotion of women’s rights in Africa.
COVID19 - Vaccine Mandates and Workplace Mandates: Article 4: The Rights to Life, Integrity and Security of the Person
MOST importantly and particular, the Women’s Rights Protocol makes explicit the protection of women’s rights in areas that are not expressly covered by existing treaties by addressing non-consensual scientific experimentation on women AND violence against women in both the public and private spheres….
States Parties are required to prohibit all forms of exploitation, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. In addition, they must, among other things:
Prohibit non-consensual scientific experimentation on women;
Enact and enforce laws against all forms of violence against women, whether the violence takes place in public or private;
Rights Enshrined in the Women’s Rights Protocol
Article 1:
Definitions This Article provides definitions of terms including:
“Discrimination against women” means “any distinction, exclusion or restriction or any differential treatment based on sex and whose objectives or effects compromise or destroy the recognition, enjoyment or the exercise by women, regardless of their marital status, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in all spheres of life.”
“Harmful Practices” means “all behaviour, attitudes and/or practices which negatively affect the fundamental rights of women and girls, such as their right to life, health, dignity, education and physical integrity.”
“Violence against women” “means all acts perpetrated against women which cause or could cause them physical, sexual, psychological, and economic harm, including the threat to take such acts, or to undertake the imposition of arbitrary restrictions on or deprivation of fundamental freedoms in private or public life in peacetime and during situations of armed conflicts or of war.” Relevant provisions of other instruments:
Significantly, the African Women’s Protocol refers to women’s informed consent to participation in clinical research in article 4 which deals with the rights to life, integrity and security of the person.
and
Article 4(2) provides that ‘States Parties shall take appropriate and effective measures to … (h) prohibit all medical or scientific experiments on women without their informed consent.
Article 4:
Apart from article 7 of the International Criminal Court, the African Women’s Protocol is the only human rights instrument that contains a provision that mentions informed consent explicitly, applicable to the situation of research participants in Africa. Found under Article 4: The Rights to Life, Integrity and Security of the Person.
Every woman shall be entitled to respect for her life and the integrity and security of her person. All forms of exploitation, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment and treatment shall be prohibited.
COVID Policies and VIOLATIONS
1. The State is required under this International Law, to :
Enact and enforce laws against all forms of violence against women, whether the violence takes place in public or private
“Violence against women” “means all acts perpetrated against women which cause or could cause them
physical (mandated experimental vaccination can cause or could cause harm)
psychological (workplace mandates and joblessness for parents and single Mothers)
economic harm, including the (Workplace mandates deprive the Women of independence and leave them unable to support their children)
threat to take such acts, or to (coercion or even the notion of mandates threatens Women in the workplace)
undertake the imposition of arbitrary restrictions (unscientific arbitrary vaccine mandates with no efficacy or long term data are arbitrary)
on or deprivation of fundamental freedoms in private or public life (deprivation of employment and access to sports facilities or other)
in peacetime and during situations of armed conflicts or of war (apparently this is peacetime. Then why do we feel like we are at war?)
Article 26
Requires all states parties to “ensure the implementation of this Protocol at a NATIONAL level. South African Human Rights Commission has failed in its duty. And now too, the CCMA SA considering it is a legally binding multilateral supplement to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (African Charter)
This treaty falls within the jurisdiction of the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
NOW consider the violations of the following companies on the red list. Scroll for days.
The Red List
Companies and individuals promoting, inducing, coercing and mandating
vaccination policies that are in violation of
The African Charter,
The Women’s Rights Protocol and
South Africa’s Bill of Rights:
The REDLIST As of today, there are 270 South African companies names on the list. They will FOREVER be remembered in History as violators of Human Rights in Africa by mandating experimental research medicines through coercion on civilians unnecessarily.
These companies have caused much harm to our nation’s citizens through :
Psychological abuse and threats of / or economic harm. Either through legal letters, CCMA disputes or firing which can only be constituted coercion.
They have imposed arbitrary unscientific restrictions of vaccine mandates with no efficacy or long term data and as a result, are depriving men and women of their or deprivation of fundamental freedoms during a time of peace. To name but a few
Discovery Health
Standard Bank
Absa
Woolworths
FNB
Discovery Health
Pick N Pay
Spar
Checkers
Unicef
Cape Union Mart
Dischem
Clicks
…. AND MANY MORE -
Human Resources are supposed to know law correct? Could these companies not be taken to the cleaners by those who have been violated?
ENFORCE Article 26
Enforce The Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa, which requires all states parties to “ensure the implementation of this Protocol at a NATIONAL level. Government if they fail to do these and get all these vaccine mandates declared null and void will then be guilty of violating an international treaty that protects vulnerable women and children on the African continent.
Cyril Ramaphosa, that will be your swan song. The deaths and injuries as a result of your vaccines are enormous.
Once again, Africa needs to fight off these monsters. Get them out of our Continent once and for all. It’s time Citizens call on their trade unions, politicians, The Human Rights Commission, The CCMA and the Government of South Africa, all of which are either clearly corrupted before it’s too late.
When the next generation looks back on this time in history, how will you be remembered?
Stand up and be heard.
